Victoza Lawyers of Onder Law

Victoza FDA Warning

FDA Issues Warning for Diabetes Drug Victoza

Long before the first FDA Victoza warning was issued, federal regulators expressed concerns about the safety of Victoza. Now, after two FDA Victoza warnings and a Justice Department lawsuit for illegal marketing of the drug, the American public is finally beginning to learn about Victoza risks. This page provides detailed information about the FDA Victoza warnings and Victoza risks for acute pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.

FDA Victoza Warnings

The first FDA Victoza warnings came in the form of the opinions given by safety experts at the FDA when the drug was first proposed for approval in the United States as a Type 2 diabetes treatment. Three FDA safety officials were not in favor of approving Victoza, stating they believed Victoza risks outweighed its benefits. Victoza was approved despite their concerns, but the FDA drug approval committee did require the adoption of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy as well as ongoing Victoza safety studies.

In 2013, the first official FDA Victoza warning was released, three years after the drug hit U.S. markets. This FDA Victoza warning was prompted by study resulted published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) which indicated that taking Victoza exposed patients to a heightened risk for both pancreatitis and pre-cancerous cell growth in the pancreas. Both acute pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer are severe and potentially life-threatening diseases. A warning about the heightened risk for pancreas problems from Victoza was added to the drug label.

Illegal Marketing Combats FDA Victoza Warning

Despite the public nature of the 2013 FDA Victoza warning, many doctors and patients did not take the threat seriously. There is a clear reason for this: Novo Nordisk, along with several other companies that sell incretin mimetic pharmaceutical drugs, were embroiled in a major lawsuit with the U.S. Department of Justice. Specifically, Novo Nordisk paid $58 million related to allegations of illegal marketing practices, launching doctor-education campaigns to downplay the seriousness of the FDA Victoza warning. Doctors were told the warning was untrue or not a serious risk; simultaneously some physicians were paid kickbacks for favoring Victoza over other (safer) drugs. Victoza rose to prominence as the best-selling drug in its class, bringing in more than $2 billion in 2014 alone.

Victoza Cancer Warning

Two separate studies have found evidence of a heightened risk for pancreatic cancer from Victoza. In 2013, a study published in JAMA revealed the presence of precancerous pancreas cells in Victoza users. Then, in 2016, a new study known as the LEADER clinical trial concluded that persons taking Victoza were three times more likely to develop pancreatic cancer than persons taking a placebo. To date, the drug’s warning label still does not contain a Victoza cancer warning and many consumers are not aware of the risk.

FDA Victoza Warning for Acute Pancreatitis

The FDA Victoza Pancreatitis Warning cautions patients and medical professionals about the risk of acute pancreatitis from Victoza. Acute pancreatitis is a serious medical condition that can result in tissue death, organ system failure, and even fatality. Caused by swelling and inflammation of the pancreas, the condition cuts off the organ’s blood supply. The FDA Victoza warning lists sings of acute pancreatitis and warns persons experiencing those symptoms to get medical help immediately.

Let Our Victoza Lawyers Help You

Our attorneys specialize in holding large corporations accountable when they've placed profits ahead of safety. Through settlements and winning verdicts, our attorneys have obtained millions for our clients. Let us help you today.

Victoza Lawsuits for Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer

Filing a lawsuit will allow you to hold the pharmaceutical company accountable for damage it has caused you or a loved one, while also providing real compensation for your medical expenses, suffering and loss. Contact us today for a free consultation.

For more information, visit our Victoza Pancreas Lawsuit website.

Free Case Review


Onder Law holds the highest possible peer review rating from Martindale-Hubbell

Onder Law holds the highest possible peer review rating from Martindale-Hubbell

Million Dollar Advocates Forum

We have been recognized by the Million Dollar Advocates Foum for securing million dollar settlements on behalf of our clients. Fewer than 1% of all attorneys receive this recgonition.

Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum

We have been recognized by the Million Dollar Advocates Foum for securing multi-million dollar settlements on behalf of our clients. Fewer than 1% of all attorneys receive this recgonition.

Super Lawyers

The attorneys of Onder Law have been recognized as Super Lawyers

Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum

We have been nominated as one of the Best Attorneys in America - The Most Qualified Attorneys in Our Country by Rue Ratings

Member National Trial Lawyers Association

The attorneys of Onder Law are proud members of the National Trial Lawyers Association


Onder Law handles mass tort claims that are filed in federal courts nationwide. Attorneys at Onder Law are licensed only in Missouri, Illinois and Kansas; however our attorneys have handled cases nationwide* including in: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming.

Attorneys at Onder Law have represented clients in federal multi-district litigation in the following cities*: Atlanta, GA, Austin, TX, Baltimore, MD, Birmingham, AL, Boston, MA, Buffalo, NY, Charlotte, NC, Chicago, IL, Cincinnati, OH, Cleveland, OH, Columbus, OH, Dallas, TX, Denver, CO, Detroit, MI, Fresno, CA, Hartford, CT, Honolulu, HI, Houston, TX, Indianapolis, IN, Jacksonville, FL, Kansas City, MO, Las Vegas, NV, Los Angeles, CA, Louisville, KY, Memphis, TN, Miami, FL, Milwaukee, WI, Minneapolis, MN, Nashville, TN, New Orleans, LA, New York, NY, Oklahoma City, OK, Orlando, FL, Philadelphia, PA, Phoenix, AZ, Pittsburgh, PA, Portland, OR, Providence, RI, Raleigh, NC, Richmond, VA, Riverside, CA, Rochester, NY, Sacramento, CA, Salt Lake City, UT, San Antonio, TX, San Diego, CA San Francisco, CA, San Jose, CA, Seattle, WA, St. Louis, MO, Tampa, FL, Tucson, AZ, Tulsa, OK, Virginia Beach, VA and Washington, DC.

* In order to represent clients in states where the attorneys are not licensed, they must be granted admission pro hac vice or associate with local counsel.