How Does the J&J Powder Recall Affect My Talc Lawsuit?

Lawsuit News from OnderLaw

Onder Law Firm's talc attorneys explain the Johnson & Johnson talc recall and what it means for thousands of people with cancer-related lawsuits.

Thursday, December 12, 2019 - Talcum Powder RecallOctober 18, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration made an announcement that sent shock waves throughout the legal community: After decades of denials, Johnson & Johnson voluntarily pulled 15,000 bottles of its baby powder off of shelves due to possible asbestos contamination. In conjunction with the recall, the FDA issued a statement advising consumers to stop using the Johnson & Johnson talc lot in question.

The recall was the result of FDA testing that found chrysotile fibers, a type of asbestos, in one of a limited number of baby powder samples it tested.

The move was a major blow for the company, which is currently defending itself against over 13,000 lawsuits filed by victims or survivors of people who have been diagnosed with certain asbestos-linked cancers, including ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, after using Johnson & Johnson baby powder and/or Shower to Shower talcum powder over a period of years.

Johnson & Johnson: Decades of Deceit

This year's recall, and the FDA testing that led to it, are the latest in a nearly 50-year saga that has now led to billions of dollars in verdicts against Johnson & Johnson, and ongoing investigations by the U.S. Justice Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission.

These investigations include a criminal probe to determine the extent to which Johnson & Johnson hid the fact that their own testing has confirmed the presence of asbestos in some of their talc products since 1971.

An investigation conducted by Reuters found documentation showing that, not only did Johnson & Johnson know of potential problems and fail to warn consumers, but that the FDA played a hand in turning a blind eye toward potential dangers. Instead, the investigation found, they deferred to the talc industry and allowed companies like Johnson & Johnson to self-regulate.

Read the Reuters report here.

The FDA only conceded to conducting its own testing after the Reuters report and thousands of lawsuits, underscoring the importance of civil litigation in holding corporations accountable.

Asbestos Denials

Though Johnson & Johnson agreed to a voluntary recall of one lot of talcum powder that the FDA identified as contaminated with asbestos, they did not admit fault. Instead, they conducted their own testing. Within 11 days, they announced that they had found no asbestos in their products, save for one sample that they explained was contaminated by an air conditioning unit.

Multiple reports indicate that, not only were Johnson & Johnson's tests rushed, they were also unconventional. The FDA has said it stands solidly behind its tests, which showed asbestos contamination.

Still, when Johnson & Johnson's own test results were released, its stock prices rose, indicating its own power in influencing the market.

What Does this Mean for Individual Talc Cases?

The recall and its fallout are certainly important aspects of the thousands of talc cases currently on trial or awaiting trial in the nation's courts.

Neither the FDA results nor the recall are proverbial nails in the coffin for Johnson & Johnson, but they do add to a growing mountain of evidence that, for years, Johnson & Johnson may have knowingly sold talcum powder that contains carcinogens.

There are a handful of cases close to trial right now. These bellwether cases are setting the tone for the thousands of remaining cases, many of which are represented by Onder Law Firm in St. Louis.

We believe that the FDA's discovery of trace amounts of asbestos in Johnson & Johnson baby powder and the company's attempts to discredit FDA tests is further evidence of Johnson & Johnson's willingness to put profits over lives.

Are You a Talc User who has been Diagnosed with Cancer?

You may be eligible for compensation if you are a woman who has used talc for four years or more and have been diagnosed with:

Epithelial ovarian cancer (serous, endometrioid, or clear cell)

Invasive fallopian tube cancer

Borderline serous cancer

Borderline mucinous tumor

At Onder Law Firm, we believe corporations like Johnson & Johnson need to be held accountable for the products they market and sell to consumers, especially when those products may cause harm -- or worse -- to those who use them.

If you have been diagnosed with any of the above cancers and used Johnson's Baby Powder or Shower to Shower for four or more years, join us in holding Johnson & Johnson accountable. Call Onder Law Firm at 314-963-9000, or click here to schedule a free consultation.

Tags for This Article:

talcJohnson & Johnsontalcum powder lawsuits


More Recent Lawsuit News:

No-Cost, No-Obligation Case Review.

OnderLaw, LLC in St. Louis has developed a solid reputation of excellence as a personal injury law firm handling serious injury and death claims across the country. Its mission is the pursuit of justice, no matter how complex the case or strenuous the effort. The Onder Law Firm has represented clients throughout the United States in pharmaceutical and medical device litigation, including Pradaxa, Lexapro and Yasmin/Yaz, Actos, Risperdal and others. The Onder Law Firm has won verdicts of more than $300 million in talcum powder ovarian cancer lawsuits, and has more experience representing Bayer/Monsanto glyphosate cancer victims than any other law firm in the country.

Free Case Review

Onder Law holds the highest possible peer review rating from Martindale-Hubbell

Onder Law holds the highest possible peer review rating from Martindale-Hubbell

Million Dollar Advocates Forum

We have been recognized by the Million Dollar Advocates Foum for securing million dollar settlements on behalf of our clients. Fewer than 1% of all attorneys receive this recgonition.

Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum

We have been recognized by the Million Dollar Advocates Foum for securing multi-million dollar settlements on behalf of our clients. Fewer than 1% of all attorneys receive this recgonition.

Super Lawyers

The attorneys of Onder Law have been recognized as Super Lawyers

Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum

We have been nominated as one of the Best Attorneys in America - The Most Qualified Attorneys in Our Country by Rue Ratings

Member National Trial Lawyers Association

The attorneys of Onder Law are proud members of the National Trial Lawyers Association


Onder Law handles mass tort claims that are filed in federal courts nationwide. Attorneys at Onder Law are licensed only in Missouri, Illinois and Kansas; however our attorneys have handled cases nationwide* including in: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming.

Attorneys at Onder Law have represented clients in federal multi-district litigation in the following cities*: Atlanta, GA, Austin, TX, Baltimore, MD, Birmingham, AL, Boston, MA, Buffalo, NY, Charlotte, NC, Chicago, IL, Cincinnati, OH, Cleveland, OH, Columbus, OH, Dallas, TX, Denver, CO, Detroit, MI, Fresno, CA, Hartford, CT, Honolulu, HI, Houston, TX, Indianapolis, IN, Jacksonville, FL, Kansas City, MO, Las Vegas, NV, Los Angeles, CA, Louisville, KY, Memphis, TN, Miami, FL, Milwaukee, WI, Minneapolis, MN, Nashville, TN, New Orleans, LA, New York, NY, Oklahoma City, OK, Orlando, FL, Philadelphia, PA, Phoenix, AZ, Pittsburgh, PA, Portland, OR, Providence, RI, Raleigh, NC, Richmond, VA, Riverside, CA, Rochester, NY, Sacramento, CA, Salt Lake City, UT, San Antonio, TX, San Diego, CA San Francisco, CA, San Jose, CA, Seattle, WA, St. Louis, MO, Tampa, FL, Tucson, AZ, Tulsa, OK, Virginia Beach, VA and Washington, DC.

* In order to represent clients in states where the attorneys are not licensed, they must be granted admission pro hac vice or associate with local counsel.