DePuy Knee Failure Lawyers of Onder Law

DePuy Knee Failure Lawsuit

Lawsuit after Premature Failure of DePuy Knee Systems

Persons in the United States who have been forced to undergo revision surgery due to a defective DePuy knee may be entitled to compensation through filing a DePuy knee lawsuit. If you or a member of your family had a DePuy knee implanted and then suffered from pain, instability, or bone damage related to a product defect, you may have grounds to file a DePuy knee lawsuit against the subsidiary of pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson.

DePuy knee replacement systems have been found to fail prematurely, sometimes just months after the device was implanted. This has led to patients filing DePuy knee defects lawsuits to recover damages. Patients were not warned of the risks posed by DePuy knee replacement; it is only through the experiences of real people that the danger has become public knowledge. Filing a DePuy knee lawsuit enables consumers to hold the multinational medical device maker accountable for the safety of its products and recover compensation for medical expenses, pain, suffering, and loss resulting from these defective products.

DePuy, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, is a global leader in the development and production of joint replacement parts. For the past two decades, DePuy systems have been fraught with product recalls, most notably its extensive hip device recall; the company paid $2.5 billion to resolve more than 8,000 DePuy lawsuits for defective devices. While $2.5 billion seems a large sum, it should be noted that Johnson & Johnson brought in $71.9 billion in annual sales during 2016. Some critics say large conglomerates such as this view litigation is a cost of doing business, only warning consumers of the risk when forced to do so.

DePuy Knee Lawsuit Claims

If you or a loved one were forced to undergo revision surgery as a result of a defective DePuy knee, you may qualify to file a DePuy knee lawsuit to recover compensation for damages you have suffered as a result of this defective medical device. Filing a lawsuit is the only way to secure compensation for the ways in which early failure of a DePuy knee has affected your family including medical bills, lost time at work, pain, suffering and loss. Our lawyers handle DePuy knee replacement lawsuits for clients originating anywhere in the United States, and offer no-cost, no-obligation DePuy knee case review for persons who fit this description. To discuss your circumstances, get questions answered, and learn about DePuy knee lawsuit time limits in your state, please complete our online contact form. One of our attorneys handling DePuy knee defect lawsuits will contact you promptly.

DePuy Knee Lawsuits Are Not Class Action Lawsuits

If you have been harmed by a defective medical device, you may wonder if filing a claim is worth the trouble. Our experienced medical device liability attorneys believe that any settlements for DePuy knee lawsuits will constitute significant and real compensation for those harmed, in accordance with the individual circumstances of each case. DePuy knee lawsuits will not be class action lawsuits in which those who file a claim can expect only a small, symbolic settlement. While DePuy knee lawsuits will likely be consolidated as Multi-District Litigation (MDL), each claim will be handled on its own merit and compensation will be determined based on the degree of suffering of each plaintiff.

DePuy Lawsuits: No Fees Unless We Collect for You

We will represent all persons involved in a DePuy knee lawsuit on a contingency basis, meaning our attorneys charge never charge any legal fees unless we win compensation in your case. For a free no-obligation consultation please fill out our short online contact form and one of ourĀ  lawyers handling DePuy knee lawsuit claims will contact you to answer any of your questions.

No-Cost, No-Obligation DePuy Lawsuit Case Review If You or a Loved One Suffered from DePuy Knee Complications

The Onder Law Firm is a St. Louis personal injury law firm handling serious injury and death claims across the country. Its mission is the pursuit of justice, no matter how complex the case or strenuous the effort. The Onder Law Firm has represented clients throughout the United States in pharmaceutical and medical device litigation such as Pradaxa, Lexapro and Yasmin/Yaz, where the firm's attorneys held significant leadership roles in the litigation, as well as Actos, DePuy, Risperdal and others. The Onder Law Firm won $197 million in three talcum powder ovarian cancer lawsuits in St. Louis in 2016 and other law firms throughout the nation often seek its experience and expertise on complex litigation.

For more information, visit our DePuy Knee Lawsuit website.

Free Case Review


Onder Law holds the highest possible peer review rating from Martindale-Hubbell

Onder Law holds the highest possible peer review rating from Martindale-Hubbell

Million Dollar Advocates Forum

We have been recognized by the Million Dollar Advocates Foum for securing million dollar settlements on behalf of our clients. Fewer than 1% of all attorneys receive this recgonition.

Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum

We have been recognized by the Million Dollar Advocates Foum for securing multi-million dollar settlements on behalf of our clients. Fewer than 1% of all attorneys receive this recgonition.

Super Lawyers

The attorneys of Onder Law have been recognized as Super Lawyers

Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum

We have been nominated as one of the Best Attorneys in America - The Most Qualified Attorneys in Our Country by Rue Ratings

Member National Trial Lawyers Association

The attorneys of Onder Law are proud members of the National Trial Lawyers Association


Onder Law handles mass tort claims that are filed in federal courts nationwide. Attorneys at Onder Law are licensed only in Missouri, Illinois and Kansas; however our attorneys have handled cases nationwide* including in: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming.

Attorneys at Onder Law have represented clients in federal multi-district litigation in the following cities*: Atlanta, GA, Austin, TX, Baltimore, MD, Birmingham, AL, Boston, MA, Buffalo, NY, Charlotte, NC, Chicago, IL, Cincinnati, OH, Cleveland, OH, Columbus, OH, Dallas, TX, Denver, CO, Detroit, MI, Fresno, CA, Hartford, CT, Honolulu, HI, Houston, TX, Indianapolis, IN, Jacksonville, FL, Kansas City, MO, Las Vegas, NV, Los Angeles, CA, Louisville, KY, Memphis, TN, Miami, FL, Milwaukee, WI, Minneapolis, MN, Nashville, TN, New Orleans, LA, New York, NY, Oklahoma City, OK, Orlando, FL, Philadelphia, PA, Phoenix, AZ, Pittsburgh, PA, Portland, OR, Providence, RI, Raleigh, NC, Richmond, VA, Riverside, CA, Rochester, NY, Sacramento, CA, Salt Lake City, UT, San Antonio, TX, San Diego, CA San Francisco, CA, San Jose, CA, Seattle, WA, St. Louis, MO, Tampa, FL, Tucson, AZ, Tulsa, OK, Virginia Beach, VA and Washington, DC.

* In order to represent clients in states where the attorneys are not licensed, they must be granted admission pro hac vice or associate with local counsel.