Pure Comparative Fault: What Does it Mean?

When determining fault and damages in a personal injury claim, there are several different methods that are used to allocate who receives what in the end. In the state of Missouri, the method that has been used in 1983 is that of pure comparative fault.

Simply speaking, pure comparative fault allows for the injured party to still receive damages if they were partially at fault for the cause of the accident. They, however, will have damages that are reduced in proportion to the amount of fault they were determined to have. For example, if it is determined that the injured party was 20% at fault for a car accident occurring, they will only be eligible to receive 80% of the damages that the case is valued at.

This differs from the more extreme and traditional form of contributory negligence. Under this method, an injured party would be barred from receiving any sort of financial compensation if it was determined that they were even 1% at fault for the accident occurring.

If you have recently suffered in a serious accident – no matter whether it was from medical malpractice, a workplace accident or if it was a slip and fall – you likely have grounds for a personal injury claim. If you would like to have your case reviewed and to discuss any questions that you have regarding to liability, it is highly encouraged that you consult with a St. Louis personal injury lawyer from the Onder Law Firm.

With extensive experience regarding the personal injury claim process, you can trust that they will be there every step of the way to help you protect your best interests. They know what is on the line and are prepared to go the distance in their efforts to help you obtain the just outcome that you deserve. So do not waste another moment – contact the Onder Law Firm as soon as possible.